Maine Voter's Guide to Question 2: The Forestry Referendum
"Do you favor requiring landowners to obtain a permit for all clear-cuts and defining cutting levels for lands subject to the tree growth tax law?"
Complete text of "An Act Regarding Forest Practices"
Welcome! to the first of many resources and projects offered by the Maine Environmental Policy Institute that are designed to help you, the citizen's of Maine, make up your own mind and to take action on environmental issues. Our goal is to provide you with the facts, the arguments made by each side, and all the independent supporting information you need to arrive at your own decision. This guide contains all articles, editorials, and opinion pieces written in Maine newspapers on Question 2, links to each side's web site, and other background material as well. Make sure to check back often between now and November 7th, as this site will be updated daily with new articles, news and more. Please let us know if we have left anything out, and thank you for visiting our site and for your interest in the issues. - William Sugg, Executive Director, Maine Environmental Policy Institute.
This guide is organized into the following sections:
The case for the referendum
The case against the referendum
Feature articles, testimony, analyses
News items
Listed with most recent items on top
- Question 2 on woods
has no middle ground (Kennebec Journal/Morning Sentinel,
10/30/00)
- Woods work: Few are happy with the state of the forest or Question 2 (Maine Times, 10/27/00)
- Celebrity activist endorses Question 2 (Portland Press Herald, 10/27/00)
- Bucksport council
opposes forestry referendum (Bangor Daily News,
10/27/00)
- Ecologist: Science can mediate forestry debate
(Brunswick Times Record, 10/27/00)
- Question 2: Not so clear-cut (Brunswick Times
Record, 10/25/00)
- Report: No crisis in Maine forests (Bangor Daily News, 10/25/00)
- Forest report deepens debate on Question 2 (Portland Press Herald, 10/25/00)
- Forestry initiative
backers speak (Kennebec Journal/Morning Sentinel,
10/24/00)
- Campaign briefs: Sierra Club Announces Yes on 2 ad campaign; Julia Butterfly Hill To Visit Maine (scroll
down) (Portland Press Herald, 10/24/00)
- Big paper companies bankrolling 'Vote No on 2' campaign (Portland Press Herald, 10/20/00)
- Question 2 raises concerns in wood industries (Bangor Daily News, 10/19/00)
- Poll shows support slipping to 32 percent in favor of Question 2 (Bangor Daily News, 10/18/00)
- String of conservation deals have brought an area seven times the size of Baxter State Park under protection (Bangor Daily News, 10/18/00)
- Poll: Question 2 losing ground (Portland Press Herald, 10/18/00)
- Question 2 gets drubbing during Pittsfield meeting (Kennebec Journal/Morning Sentinel, 10/18/00)
- The promise of forest certification (Bangor Daily News, 10/17/00)
- Jonathan Carter makes unlikely savior of the forest (Bangor Daily News, 10/16/00)
- Small woodlot owner fears referendum (Bangor Daily News, 10/16/00)
- Mainers debate woods rules (Bangor Daily News, 10/14/00)
- Friends of Merrymeeting Bay’s Speaker Series Presents: What is Sensible Forestry? A Look at Both Sides of the Forestry Referendum, Wednesday October 18th at 7 p.m., Beam Classroom, Visual Arts Center, Bowdoin College, Brunswick
- Maine Audubon and the Wildlife Society’s Maine Chapter come out against forestry referendum (Lewiston Sun-Journal, 10/13/00)
- Jonathan Carter accuses Gov. King of playing politics with announcement about logging on state public lands (Portland Press Herald, 10/13/00)
- Barbs exchanged in Guilford Question 2 debate (Bangor Daily News, 10/13/00)
- Fairfield town councilors vote to oppose the statewide forest practices referendum (Bangor Daily News, 10/12/00)
- Dover-Foxcroft selectmen vote to oppose forestry referendum (Bangor Daily News, 10/10/00)
- Small lot owners fear impact of forestry vote (Bangor Daily News, 10/6/00)
- Latest anti-clearcut referendum gets NRCM support (Note: scroll down) (Maine Times, 10/5/00)
- Somerset County Commissioners sign resolutions opposing forestry referendum and Maine Woods National Park and Preserve, (Kennebec Journal/Morning Sentinel, 10/5/00)
- Buchanan takes on forestry referendum (Portland Press Herald, 10/3/00)
- Sides battle over forests' future (Portland Press Herald, 10/1/00)
- Leaders worried by forest proposal (Bangor Daily News, 9/30/00)
- Conservationists log Question 2 support (Bangor Daily News, 9/29/00)
- Question 2 poll: 46 percent favor, 39 percent opposed, 15 percent undecided (Lewiston Sun-Journal, 9/27/00)
- Forestry referendum opponents raise hundreds of thousands of dollars (Lewiston Sun-Journal, 9/26/00)
- Foes link forest referendum to sprawl (Portland Press Herald, 9/21/00)
- Some environmental groups haven't stated position on Question 2 (Lewiston Sun-Journal, 9/19/00)
- Public support is declining for forestry referendum (Bangor Daily News, 9/16/00)
- Forestry industry should police itself, says major opponent of Question 2 (Bangor Daily News, 9/16/00)
- Rural lawmakers challenge legality of this November's clearcutting referendum (Portland Press Herald, 7/26/00)
Opinion pieces and editorials
Listed with most recent items on top
- Editorial: Maine needs better forestry controls, but Question 2 is not the answer (Lewiston Sun-Journal, 11/6/00)
- Opinion: Question 2 poor forest science (Bangor Daily News, 11/1/00)
- Opinion: Small woodland
owners oppose Question 2 (Portland Press Herald,
11/1/00)
- Opinion: No more
business as usual in Maine woods (Bangor Daily News,
10/30/00)
- Editorial: Vote
'no' on Question 2 (Kennebec Journal/Morning Sentinel,
10/30/00)
- Opinion: Forestry
referendum should be passed (Portland Press Herald,
10/29/00)
- Opinion: Bill
encourages bad forestry practices (Portland Press Herald,
10/28/00)
- Opinion: Yes on 2
for Maine forests (Bangor Daily News, 10/28/00)
- Editorial: Yes, barely, on Questions 2 and 6 (scroll
down) (Maine Times, 10/27/00)
- Editorial: Vote no on 2
(scroll down) (Casco Bay Weekly, 10/27/00)
- Editorial: Yes on Question 2 (scroll down) (Portland Phoenix,
10/26/00)
- Editorial: No on Question 2
(Camden Herald, 10/26/00)
- Editorial: Forest survey 'timely' but less than conclusive (Kennebec
Journal/Morning Sentinel, 10/26/00)
- Opinion: Prudent
forest management: 'Best practices' considerations can differ markedly (Kennebec Journal/Morning Sentinel, 10/24/00)
- Opinion: Real issue is in the North Woods
(Brunswick Times Record, 10/24/00)
- Opinion: No upside to Question 2 (Brunswick Times
Record, 10/24/00)
- Opinion: Forestry referendum Echoes of Maine’s White Pine Revolt (Bangor Daily News, 10/16/00)
- Opinion: Question 2 isn't the right approach (Portland Press Herald, 10/15/00)
- Editorial: Forestry referendum should be defeated (Portland Press Herald, 10/15/00)
- Opinion: Support sound forestry by voting 'yes' Nov. 7 (Portland Press Herald, 10/14/00)
- Opinion: Vote yes on No. 2 to stop the continued destruction of Maine’s forests. (Bangor Daily News, 10/13/00)
- Opinion: Forestry vote bad for landowners (Portland Press Herald, 10/11/00)
- Opinion: Question 2 will disrupt the social economic infrastructure of forestry in Maine (Bangor Daily News, 10/10/00)
- Opinion: Pat Buchanan came to Maine to assail a forestry referendum? (Portland Press Herald, 10/6/00)
- Editorial: Pulp and paper industry using tangential arguments to obfuscate a forest practices referendum (Note: scroll down) (Maine Times, 10/5/00)
- Opinion: Forestry issue worthy of voters' support (Portland Press Herald, 9/30/00)
- Opinion: Carter's poison forestry pill: present referendum could have been smartly avoided (Kennebec Journal/Morning Sentinel, 9/28/00)
- Opinion: Question 2 another of Jonathan Carter's forestry disasters? (Portland Press Herald, 9/25/00)
- Editorial: Questioning forestry referendum question in the November election (Bangor Daily News, 9/23/00)
- Opinion: Forestry, park issues deceptive (Portland Press Herald, 9/22/00)
- Opinion: Certification or referendum is a false choice for forests (Bangor Daily News, 8/7/00)
- Editorial: Forestry referendum language query not Governor's to answer (Kennebec Journal/Morning Sentinel, 8/3/00)
- Editorial: Carter's Forest proposal goes in wrong direction (Lewiston Sun-Journal, 6/29/00)
Other information and resources
Maine Environmental Policy Institute
220 Water Street,
Hallowell, Maine 04347. Phone: 207-622-9766
Email: meepi@meepi.org